There are four stages for the feminism. The first of them appeared when women tried to take their right. Women had not any place in the society and they lived as the animals. It was named the patriarchy. It was the reasonable movement. The other stage is one that people accepted the equality between man and woman. It was result of their effort to adjudicate woman’s right. The third one is that woman tried to become predominant and superior sex.After this battle, they conceived that it was not enough and must continue to reaching to other ends. We can entitle this stage matriarchy. The last one is that the feminism encounters to defeat. Rather in this stage, the followers found that the doctrines of feminism were deficient. Thus, the only one of those stages is legitimate, namely the first one, and the others are unreasonable.
+ نوشته شده در سه شنبه یازدهم دی 1386ساعت 0:23  توسط وحيدي
|
The rainfall is a so beauty and usefull event. In the morning, I wake up by hearing the tone of rainfall.The raindrops consecutive strike to windowpane. The rainfall effectuates the relaxing ton that it is very enjoyable. The industrial factories produce the smoke that it makes pollution the air. Nvwrtheless,the rainfall make the air clean.Obviously,the rainwater gives to the beings life.
+ نوشته شده در سه شنبه بیست و هفتم آذر 1386ساعت 0:18  توسط وحيدي
|
Cinema
Cinema has very influence on our life and our culture.In fact,there
is close relation between them.Cinema can change the our culture.
This changing can be good or bad.Nowadays,it is a tool in the hand of
politicans,e.g.the USA when wants to attack to Iraq makes a film
about the arabian terrorists.Thus it provide the mind of people
to support and accept it's attack.I believe that cinema forms
and changes the our life and it is very dengerous.
Comments: Please read the Farsi guidelines and modify the text.
+ نوشته شده در دوشنبه بیست و هشتم آبان 1386ساعت 21:44  توسط وحيدي
|
Death
Death isnot (is not) the end of the life. It is like (a) bridge through that (which) one can move (pass) to otherwhere (the other world). The death is a (the) beginning of the life in (the) other world. Someone thinks (Some may think) that our life is ended (ends) with the death. But (,) it isnot (is not) true, because bout (both) of the our intellect and religion say something opposite of their opinion. The death is a boat by that (which) one can move to otherside of the river of life.
Dear Vahidi,
Thanks a lot. This is much better than your previous paragraph. But, please pay more attention to the use of "the" and of relative pronouns like "that." In fact, if there is a preposition before relative pronouns, you cannot use "that". Please, continue writing.
A. Sultani
+ نوشته شده در دوشنبه بیست و یکم آبان 1386ساعت 19:47  توسط وحيدي
|
Philosophical Hermeneutics
I want to speak about hermeneutic and especially about philosophical hermeneutic that was formed first (first introduced) by Gadamer who was (,) a German philosopher.
Hermeneutic is the art of interpretation of text. It was used at the beginning strictly for (the) interpretation of Scripture (the Scriptures), but after that it was used for every text and finally used by Gadamer for existence.
He belived that being is (a kind of) text and everybody lie (?) in it and has hermeneutical experience (which everybody experiences). Every one always makes interpretation and tries to understand. For one is in a text and this needed to interpret to understand (Since everyone lives in a kind of text, he/she needs to interpret and understand it). On the other hand, world is a text (too).
In short, Gadamer, in fact, used the ontological hermeneutic.
Mr. Vahidi,
Thanks a lot for joining us,
Please read the comments and try to rewrite it.
-
Your passage consists of a number of loosely related sentences. In fact, there is no paragraph. Try to write in the form of one-paragraph essays as we discussed in the class and join all the sentences together.
-
The main problem with your passage is that the idea is too broad to be developed within these few sentences. In other words, there is no clear and limited topic sentence. Without writing a good topic sentence, you cannot write a good paragraph. So, next time try to focus only on one single aspect of Gadamer's approach to hermerneutics.
-
Do not use a first person point of view. I mean do not say "I want to talk about this or that." The reader himself understands that you wrote something because you wanted to talk to your reader.
Ali Sultani
+ نوشته شده در جمعه هجدهم آبان 1386ساعت 11:49  توسط وحيدي
|